That legal bar prevents cases being launched years and years late, to prevent unfair and unjust outcomes. ![]() Mirror Group News' lawyers say two of the claimants, Nikki Sanderson and Fiona Wightman, have run out of time to sue for damages.Ĭlaims for damages should be brought within six years of the alleged victim knowing what happened. He cited coverage of a 2015 civil trial in which the publisher was found to have hacked the phones of eight celebrities - but he argued they have now run out of time to sue for damages. He said two of the claimants, Nikki Sanderson and Fiona Wightman, could have brought a claim against the Mirror Group years earlier. Later, Green made the case that "any reasonable person" would have been aware of the phone hacking scandal that shut down the News of the World in 2011. Our legal correspondent Dominic Casciani explained that claims for damages should be brought within six years of the alleged victim knowing what happened. Green argued that the claims before the court in this hearing are essentially out of time - and that they should have been brought earlier. This afternoon we heard from the Mirror Group's lawyer, Andrew Green KC, who said the latest claims are of a "breath-taking level of triviality" and claimants were "smearing" executives by accusing the board of lies to cover up hacking. This was after he alleged on Thursday that such illicit activities were "widespread" and "authorised at the highest level" at the Mirror Group - which has denied using voicemail interception in these cases. This morning, Sherborne alleged that unlawful information-gathering practices - including hacking voicemails - to obtain private information had been covered up at the paper. The claims have been brought by Prince Harry and three other high-profile claimants, represented by barrister David Sherborne KC. This is especially even more important if your data is critical to you and/or your business.The third day of the High Court hearing over alleged phone hacking claims against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) has wrapped up. It is important to understand that data redundancy should not be used as a data backup solution and that backing up data on systems with redundant drives is still a best practice. ![]() I would have a couple hot spare drives on site with the two-way mirror configuration since if one dies, time is critical to get a new one added and rebuilt to ensure continued data redundancy. when it's a little more critical-you can thank yourself then for doing this now. This should be simple to test and document the process so you know what to do later down the road once time has passed and it's time to replace a failed drive, etc. While you can, and before you start putting critical data on the storage space, do some testing and confirm that it works as simple as it is supposed to. Start testing the functionality now while it's not urgent to confirm and document the procedure in detail so you have a good understanding but it should be "simple" for you just like you say it seems. You will still need to manage and monitor the disk usage, and routinely to take proactive measures such as adding a disk to the pool with expand operations, etc. The storage pool manages the group of disks in an array and is smart enough to figure out how to distribute data written to the disks (including mirror copies) to ensure optimal usage.įilling up any disk partition to full capacity is never a good thing since once it is filled and a new write operation comes in then you will start having problems. If I fill this drive to the brink, will redundancy still hold? ![]() If you leverage the ReFS file system type with your storage spaces, then you further increase the resiliency of your data written on the disks. This configuration seems to be just as robust as a RAID configuration in terms of data redundancy, hot swapping, expanding, etc. How robust is two-way mirrored storage spaces?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |